Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we compare two different connected cruise control strategies that utilize vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication to monitor multiple vehicles ahead in order to save fuel. One strategy uses direct feedback while the other is based on dynamic optimization that assigns the control action in a receding horizon fashion while relying on preview information about the vehicle immediately ahead. We demonstrate that both methods produce significant fuel improvements but the performance of the second controller depends significantly on the length of time horizon as well as the accuracy of the preview information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: