Computers don't support conversation well, particularly asynchronous conversations among groups. Such conversations often lack coherence, tending towards drift, dissolution or chaos. The object of this study-a conversation that repeatedly succeeds in producing coherent results-is a counterexample. Two features seem important: it is structured by the conventions of a well-known genre, and as it proceeds it develops new conventions. This paper analyzes the emergence and enforcement of the conversation's conventions over the course of a year, and examines the interplay between the conventions and the user interface, concluding with suggestions on how to design systems which support more coherent conversation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Erickson (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: