This paper describes briefly a methodology for developing multiple‐choice critical thinking tests which attempts to overcome certain problems of validity and fairness facing such tests. The paper proposes that direct evidence on test validity be gathered using verbal reports of students' thinking on trial items.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen P. Norris (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: