Lagrangian submanifolds play a special role in the geometry of symplectic manifolds. From the point of view of quantization theory, or simply a cate- gorical approach to symplectic geometry [Gu-S2], [W3], lagrangian submanifolds are the "elements" of symplectic manifolds. Since the canonical transformations between symplectic manifolds P₁ and P₂ are those whose graphs are lagrangian in P₂ P₁⁻ (the $"-,$ , indicating that the symplectic structure on P₁ has been multiplied by $-1$ ), one calls arbitrary lagrangian submanifolds of a product P₂ P₁⁻ canonical relations. It turns out that, under a transversality or clean intersection assumption, the composition of canonical relations is again canonical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan Weinstein (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: