Why the study?
Gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy has high mortality, but data remain limited due to its low incidence, requiring characterisation of its time to onset.
What is the time to onset and pattern of development of gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy in a Japanese population?
What is the time to onset and pattern of development of gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy in a Japanese population?
Gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy typically occurs around 5-8 months after treatment initiation and appears to develop in a non-dose-dependent manner.
May warrant vigilance for G-TMA ~5 months post-gemcitabine; leaves open non-dose-dependent onset in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (G-TMA) is associated with a high mortality rate. However, owing to its low incidence, data on G-TMA remain limited. Therefore, a detailed review of G-TMA cases is critical to understand this adverse event. In addition, reviewing literature and pharmacovigilance analytics may be useful to characterise G-TMA. Here, time to onset of G-TMA was analysed based on available data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data for a case of TMA following gemcitabine administration at the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital. We also reviewed the literature on G-TMA cases in Japan from April 2000 to March 2022 to provide a case series. Moreover, we performed time-to-onset analysis of G-TMA using the data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. RESULTS: Our case involved a patient with pancreatic cancer who developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura 13 months after starting gemcitabine treatment. From the literature reviewed, in 14 out of 17 cases, G-TMA occurred 5-8 months after treatment initiation. The analysis of data from the JADER database showed that the median time to onset of G-TMA was 161 days. Weibull shape parameter analysis showed that the pattern of onset of G-TMA represented a random failure. CONCLUSION: This study elucidated the time to onset of G-TMA in a Japanese population. Weibull shape parameter analysis showed that G-TMA may not necessarily develop in a dose-dependent manner. These results may be useful for monitoring G-TMA in the clinical setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takigawa et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis