Why the study?
Does the presence of atrial baffles after atrial switch operation restrict the increase in stroke volume under dobutamine stress compared to patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries?
Does the presence of atrial baffles after atrial switch operation restrict the increase in stroke volume under dobutamine stress compared to patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries?
Atrial baffles in patients after atrial switch operation restrict the ability to increase stroke volume during dobutamine stress, which may explain their limited exercise performance.
May link atrial baffles to impaired stress-induced stroke volume response; leaves open causal role in exercise intolerance pending longitudinal data.
BACKGROUND: Patients after atrial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries have limited exercise performance. Rigid atrial baffles may cause a relative preload reduction. Previous studies have had suboptimal control groups, which ideally should consist of patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) without previous heart surgery, having a systemic right ventricle, but lacking rigid atrial baffles. Therefore the aim of this study was to test the impact of atrial baffles by comparing 12 atrial switch patients with 11 ccTGA patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Systemic right ventricular stroke volume (SV), heart rate, cardiac index, and other parameters were assessed during rest and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging. The most important difference between the groups was that the atrial switch patients could not increase SV during stress, whereas ccTGA patients increased it significantly. There was no difference between groups in the rise of the cardiac index. Heart rate increased significantly more in atrial switch patients than in ccTGA patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that atrial baffles restrict a rise in SV under dobutamine stress in patients after atrial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fratz et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: