In the past decade, institutional investors have become more active in monitoring man- agement and voting the shares they control. The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) was a leader in this wave of activism. This study investi- gates the long-term returns an investor with public information could earn by buying a portfolio offirms targeted by CaIPERS and whether the success of CaIPERS' activism depends on the aggressiveness of the targeting. The evidence supports the idea that vis- ible and aggressive activism leads to substantial increases in shareholder wealth while a quieter activism does not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crutehley et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: