The pH‐independent hydrolysis of 4‐nitrophenyl 2,2‐dichloropropionate (NPDCP) in the presence of aqueous micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, alkyltrimethylammonium chlorides, alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chlorides (alkyl = cetyl and dodecyl) and polyoxyethylene(9) nonylphenyl ether was studied spectrophotometrically. The observed rate constants, k obs , decrease in the following order: bulk water >cationic micelles >anionic micelles >non‐ionic micelles. This order is different from that observed for pH‐independent hydrolysis of 4‐nitrophenyl chloroformate (NPCF), whose reaction is faster in cationic micelles than in bulk water. A proton NMR study on solubilization of a model ester, 4‐nitrophenyl 2‐chloropropionate, showed that the methylene groups in the middle of the surfactant hydrophobic chain are most affected by the solubilizate. Lower polarity and high ionic strength of interfacial water decrease the rates of hydrolysis of both NPCF and NPDCP, but the fraction of the former ester that diffuses to the interface is probably higher than that of the latter. Therefore, whereas the (negatively charged) transition state of NPCF is stabilized by cationic interfaces and destabilized by anionic interfaces, that of NPDCP is negligibly affected by ionic interfaces, which explains the observed rate retardation by all ionic micelles. Calculated activation parameters corroborate our explanation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seoud et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: