In recent years, a burgeoning literature has attended to transformations in notions of intimacy, romantic love and conjugality in South Asia, and challenged the depiction of these processes as unilineal shifts from collective (‘traditional’) obligations to individual desire (a symbol of ‘modernity’). Picking up on these themes, this article considers the coexistence of different modes of intimacy in middle-class urban Pakistan. Through a focus on emotive practices of young upwardly mobile women in Lahore and Karachi, it draws out how different ideals of intimacy coexist, the ways in which they are entangled in everyday practices, and the sites, situations and spaces in which they separate. Living largely in joint-family arrangements, young women continuously negotiate between, on the one hand, private desires for nuclear family life and associated forms of consumption and, on the other hand, the economic pressures and emotional obligations that necessitate collective living. A continuous presence of liminality allows for a way in which these conflicting desires are experienced and managed. Liminality, here, allows for experimentation and potentiality, a zone in which new desires and practices are experienced. Yet, simultaneously, it encompasses ‘emotion work’ that bends and brings these new emotional trajectories in line with dominant moral codes. Ultimately it is not the processual transformation from collective to individualized ties, nor a disruption of pre-existing ethical codes but the management of differing demands and desires that is constitutive of ‘feeling’ middle-class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammara Maqsood (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: