Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To determine knowledge of sexually transmitted chlamydia infection among university undergraduates following the introduction of a National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP). METHODS: Anonymous self-administered questionnaire on chlamydia knowledge and sexual behaviour provided to a convenience sample of 400 university undergraduates. RESULTS: There were 259 responses (65%) and 17% of respondents were aware of the NCSP. Female students had significantly higher mean knowledge scores than males (p < 0.001), were more likely to be aware of the NCSP (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.70, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.11-7.49) and to have ever attended chlamydia screening (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.33-6.66). Overall, higher mean knowledge scores did not translate into reduced risk taking sexual behaviour, and female respondents were significantly more likely to attend for a 'general check-up' if they 'had sex without a condom with a person of unknown sexual history' (p = 0.043). Popular sources of chlamydia-related information were friends and the media. The internet was not a major source of information. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness regarding the NCSP, chlamydia infection and screening is limited and perception of personal risk poor. New evidence-based strategies are required to address knowledge gaps and risk-taking behaviour among university students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greaves et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: