This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Convolutional codes are widely used in many applications. The encoders can be implemented with a simple circuit. Decoding is often accomplished by the Viterbi algorithm or the maximum a-posteriori decoder of Bahl et al. These algorithms are sequential in nature, requiring a decoding time proportional to the message length. For low latency applications this this latency might be problematic. This paper introduces a low latency decoder for tail-biting convolutional codes TBCCs that processes multiple trellis stages in parallel. The new decoder is designed for hardware with parallel processing capabilities. The overall decoding latency is proportional to the log of the message length. The new decoding architecture is modified into a list decoder, and the list decoding performance can be enhanced by exploiting linearity to expand the search space. Certain modifications to standard TBCCs are supported by the new architecture and improve frame error rate performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: