Why the study?
It was unknown whether flow reserve in low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography could predict major cardiovascular events and clinical outcomes 1 year after TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF.
Does flow reserve during preoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography predict MACE and functional outcomes at 1 year in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF undergoing TAVI?
Does flow reserve during preoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography predict MACE and functional outcomes at 1 year in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF undergoing TAVI?
Preoperative flow reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography does not predict 1-year MACE or functional outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF undergoing TAVI.
Flow reserve on dobutamine stress echo should not guide TAVI risk stratification in severe AS with preserved LVEF; leaves open its value in other populations.
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess if flow reserve (FR) in low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) could predict major cardiovascular events (MACE) 1 year after TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We also explored the relationship between FR and NYHA class, 6-min walk test, left ventricular function, and quality of life (SF-36). METHODS: The DSE protocol (n = 72) was performed up to 20 μg/kg/min preoperatively, and FR was defined as ≥ 20% increase in stroke volume (SV). Echocardiography, walking test, and SF-36 were repeated at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Average age was 80 ± 5 years. Preoperative peak aortic valve velocity was 4.7 ± 0.6 m/s and LVEF was 65% ± 9%. SV increased from 81 ± 19 to 92 ± 20 mL during the DSE. Twenty-five patients (36%) had FR. The prevalence of MACE was 13% at follow-up. Patients with or without FR had no significant differences in MACE (p = 1.000), NYHA class (p = 0.375), walking distance (p = 0.262), left ventricular function, or quality of life. CONCLUSION: FR in DSE could not predict long-term outcomes after TAVI, and offered no additional prognostic value for this patient group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sævik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: