Why the study?
Does a computational method using 64-channel ECG body surface potentials and anatomical data accurately determine the depolarization sequence of the human heart surface compared to invasive measurements?
Does a computational method using 64-channel ECG body surface potentials and anatomical data accurately determine the depolarization sequence of the human heart surface compared to invasive measurements?
A non-invasive computational method using 64-channel ECG and anatomical data can successfully estimate ventricular surface activation sequences that resemble invasive measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports noninvasive ventricular activation mapping; leaves open prospective validation in clinical cohorts.
Huiskamp et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: