Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 2002

Developing a reliable, valid, and feasible plan for quality-of-care measurement for cancer: how should we measure?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KKKatherine L. KahnRAND CorporationJMJennifer L. MalinCentre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and TectonicsJAJohn AdamsKaiser Permanente

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kahn et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bf6c3c97d63156a5f26cahttps://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200206001-00011
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing Outcomes of Care Before and After Implementation of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System1990 · 294 citations
  2. 2The Effect of Comorbidity on 3-Year Survival of Women with Primary Breast Cancer1994 · 739 citations
  3. 3Income non-reporting: implications for health inequalities research2000 · 180 citations
  4. 4Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st Century2000 · 876 citations