PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 1991The Journal of Comparative Neurology367 citations

Myelo‐ and cytoarchitecture of the granular frontal cortex and surrounding regions in the strepsirhine primate Galago and the anthropoid primate Macaca

View Full Paper
TPTodd M. PreussOregon National Primate Research Center
Patricia S. Goldman‐Rakic
Patricia S. Goldman‐RakicUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

As the first part of a comparative investigation of primate frontal cortex, we compared the frontal architectonic organization of Galago, a small-brained, strepsirhine (or "prosimian") primate, to that of an anthropoid primate, Macaca, by using myelin- and Nissl-stained material. We were able to distinguish many more areas in both taxa than have been recognized in most previous studies of the primate frontal lobe. In particular, we were able to subdivide many of the areas shown in the commonly cited architectonic map of Walker (J. Comp. Neurol. 73:59-86, 1940). Delineation of areas was greatly facilitated by the use of the Gallyas technique for staining myelin. The areal organization of much of frontal cortex (specifically, the premotor, orbital, and medial regions) appears to be very similar in Galago and Macaca. In these regions, we were able to recognize the same complement of areas in both taxa, with few exceptions. In the granular frontal cortex (GFC), by contrast, we were able to distinguish about twice as many areas in Macaca as in Galago. For most of the GFC areas of Galago, there are architectonically similar areas in Macaca; the areas shared by both taxa correspond mainly to the arcuate and superior areas of Macaca (i.e., the region encompassed by Walker's areas 45, 8A, and 8B). However, there are many additional, more rostral, areas in Macaca for which there are no obvious homologues in Galago. In particular, Galago lacks cortex resembling the distinctive, lightly myelinated cortex of the Macaca principal sulcus (Walker's area 46 and its subdivisions). Our results are difficult to reconcile with the view that frontal lobe organization varies little across taxa. Rather, they suggest that granular frontal cortex underwent considerable change during primate evolution, including the addition of new areas in anthropoids.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Preuss et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bf6ed5b8f4ede65a94f8bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903100402
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Histonomy of the Cerebral Cortex.1960 · 200 citations
  2. 2Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology.1985 · 248 citations
  3. 3The myeloarchitectonics of the frontal cortex of the dog1961 · 36 citations
  4. 4The Cortex of the Rat1985 · 758 citations
  5. 5Thalamic input to inferior area 6 and area 4 in the macaque monkey1989 · 239 citations