Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is growing interest in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), given its increasing prevalence and our developing understanding of the disease. People living with type 2 diabetes or obesity have a greater risk of developing significant hepatic steatosis and a greater risk of more rapid progression to steatohepatitis, advanced hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As such, various international bodies now advocate for routine screening for MASLD-related hepatic fibrosis in people with such risk factors. This would permit earlier targeted lifestyle interventions and the use of pharmacotherapies, which may reverse earlier stages of MASLD-associated fibrosis. This may improve both liver-related and cardiovascular outcomes in these higher-risk groups. Nonetheless, the identification of MASLD-related hepatic fibrosis is frequently limited to liver enzyme tests, given the lack of a systematic approach to investigation and screening. In this article, we discuss the potential to screen for advanced fibrosis in people with MASLD using various blood-based biomarkers, such as the Fibrosis-4 score, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score and enhanced liver fibrosis test, amongst other available patented and non-patented tests. We discuss the relative benefits and limitations of each and the potential for future research in this evolving area of clinical interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: