Physic-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used in computational physics including electromagnetic simulations. Unlike conventional numerical solvers, PINNs leverage deep neural networks and optimization to find the solution of Maxwell’s equations given specific source and boundary conditions. When the material in the solving domain is heterogeneous, it’s not easy to enforce continuity of electromagnetic fields due to the meshless property of PINNs. On the contrary, graph neural networks (GNNs) explicitly construct a graph (mesh) and apply message passing between the nodes in the graph. In this work, GNNs and PINNs are combined to build physics-informed graph neural networks (PIGNNs) that are flexible in mesh discretization and straightforward to enforce continuity of electromagnetic fields. Moreover, PIGNNs get easier to be trained and converge by resorting to the variational formulation of Maxwell’s equations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: