Key result
Brugada syndrome is a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young to middle-aged Asian men, requiring multifactorial risk stratification and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for high-risk patients.
Why the study?
How asymptomatic Brugada syndrome patients without ventricular fibrillation history should effectively be treated remains uncertain because risk stratification is still inadequate.
This review emphasizes the high prevalence and risk of sudden cardiac death from Brugada syndrome in Asian populations and highlights the need for validated risk stratification tools in this demographic.
Risk stratification challenges persist in asymptomatic Brugada; leaves open validated tools and ICD thresholds for Asian populations.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is one of the main inherited arrhythmia syndromes causing ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden cardiac death in young to middle-aged men, especially in Asians. The diagnosis of BrS is based on spontaneous or drug-provoked type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram. The current reliable therapy for BrS patients with VF history is the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. As for BrS patients without VF history, how asymptomatic BrS patients should effectively be treated is still uncertain because risk stratification of the BrS is still inadequate. Various parameters and combinations of several parameters have been reported for risk stratification of BrS. The SCN5A gene is believed to be the only gene that is responsible for BrS, and it has been reported to be useful for risk stratification. This review focuses on risk stratification of BrS patients, and focuses specifically on BrS patients of Asian descent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakano et al. (2022) conducted a review in Brugada Syndrome and Sudden Cardiac Death. Brugada syndrome is a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young to middle-aged Asian men, requiring multifactorial risk stratification and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: