Key result
An artificial intelligence framework for automatically measuring carotid intima-media thickness demonstrated a strong correlation (r=0.874) with manual measurements by a board of experts.
Why the study?
Manual measurement of carotid intima-media thickness is observer-dependent, leading to observer bias and low reproducibility.
Does an AI framework validly and reliably measure C-IMT compared to expert manual measurement in carotid ultrasonography images?
Observational (n=60)
Single-blind
No
Does an AI framework validly and reliably measure C-IMT compared to expert manual measurement in carotid ultrasonography images?
An AI framework developed on the Neurabot platform provides valid and reliable automated measurements of carotid intima-media thickness, potentially reducing observer bias in assessing cerebrovascular disease risk.
Supports automated C-IMT assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical cerebrovascular risk use.
Carotid plaque is a biomarker of generalized atherosclerosis, and may predict ischemic stroke. Carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT) measurement with ultrasonography imaging could capture the condition of carotid plaque. However, manual measurement of C-IMT is observer- dependent, resulting in observer bias and low reproducibility. In this study, we develop artificial intelligence (AI) framework that could automatically measure the C-IMT, and compared it with C-IMT measured by board of expert. This is a retrospective study done in Dr. Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta, Indonesia. Carotid B-mode ultrasonography images were measured by panel of expert and by AI. After annotation process on Neurabot platform, AI could detect region of interest (ROI), and would do segmentation on the area to measure C-IMT autonomously. Dependent T-test was used to evaluate validity, and Cronbach’s alpha was used to find the reliability of C-IMT measured by panel of expert and AI. There was strong correlation (r=0.874; p=0.014) on dependent t-test for C-IMT measured by AI with C-IMT measured by board of expert. The internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) were 0.938 and 0.909, for pretest and posttest, respectively. We also analyzed the test-retest reliability by comparing pretest and posttest score with dependent t-test, and we observed strong correlation with r=0.871 (p=0.000). AI developed on Neurabot platform are valid and reliable to measure C-IMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danuaji et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cerebrovascular disease risk (n=60). Artificial intelligence (AI) framework for C-IMT measurement vs. Manual measurement by board of experts was evaluated on Correlation of C-IMT measurement between AI and board of experts (r=0.874, p=0.014). An artificial intelligence framework for automatically measuring carotid intima-media thickness demonstrated a strong correlation (r=0.874) with manual measurements by a board of experts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: