This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Attempts to synthesize Hf 4 NbAl 7 led to the discovery of nominal Hf 4 Nb 2 Al 7 instead of the envisioned product. It was identified based on powder diffraction data. The compound can be described as a substitutional/coloring variant of the rhombohedral W 6 Fe 7 type structure (space group R m ). The formation of the ternary compound motivates the synthesis of the binary compound Hf 6 Al 7 . Different synthetic strategies lead to its discovery. The crystal structures of the binary as well as its ternary coloring variant are refined from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data showing both the same obverse–reverse twinning. For the Nb‐containing phase, a composition of Hf 4.44(1) Nb 1.56(1) Al 7 is refined, in agreement with the powder X‐ray data. Solid‐state 27 Al NMR investigations indicate the formation of a crystalline compound; however, only one distinct signal can be observed in contrast to the two crystallographic Al positions. Magnetic susceptibility measurements confirm the expected Pauli‐paramagnetic character. Quantum‐chemical calculations alongside analyses of the chemical bonding with the LOBSTER program package show that a strong Hf–Hf interaction is present, which transforms into an even stronger Nb–Nb interaction in nominal Hf 4 Nb 2 Al 7 . For the latter, three substitutional variants are calculated, clearly indicating the experimentally observed one as the most stable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gießelmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: