This paper provides an efficiency argument in favor of progressive labor income taxation. When the consumer faces a trade-off between investments in financial and human capital, a proportional comprehensive income tax tends to discriminate in favor of human capital investments. This effect is strengthened when education no longer is a pure investment, but also holds a direct consumption value.A comprehensive proportional income tax works as a tax subsidy on human capital investments, and it reduces the price of education as a consumption good. By introducing a progressive labor income tax, the efficiency distortion in the capital market may be partly neutralised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annette Alstadsæter (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: