Consider an oriented 2-dimensional manifold m imbedded as a subcomplex in a triangulated oriented 4-dimensional manifold M in such a way that the boundary of m is contained in the boundary of M and the interior of m is contained in the interior of M. We will assume that M is a "piecewise linear manifold": that is, the star neighborhood of any point should be piecewise linearly homeomorphic to a 4-simplex.One can measure the local singularity of the imbedding at an interior point x of m as follows.Let N denote the star neighborhood of x in M. The boundary S=dN of N is a 3-shere with an orientation inherited from that of M, and k=mdNis a 1-sphere with an orientation inherited from that of m.The oriented knot type K of the imbedding of k in S is called 20 the singularity of the imbedding at x.When k is of trivial type in dN we may say that the singularity is 0 or that x is a non-singular point or that m is locally flat at x.A surface m is called locally flat if it is locally flat at each of its points.REMARK.The singularity of m at x is clearly a combinatorial invariant of M,m,x\ that is it is not altered if we subdivide M rectilinearly.We do not know whether or not this singularity is a topological invariant, except in the special case of a locally flat point.The topological invariance of the concept of local flatness is easily proved, making use of Dehn's lemma, [12, 28(i)].Of course the local singularity can also be measured at a boundary point x.In this case 3iVis a 3-cell, mdN is a 1-cell spanning it, and the singularity is a type of spanning 1-cell.In this paper we shall consider only imbeddings whose boundary points are all non-singular.Since a singular point must be a vertex in any triangulation of the pair mczM the singular points are always isolated.If m is compact (as it will be from now on) there can therefore be only a finite number of singular points.For the rest of this paper m will be a 2-sphere and M will be the 4-dimensional euclidean space R A \ that is, the 4-sphere punctured at oo.The basic problem 1) This paper follows our announcement [3].We wish to express our thanks to C.H. Giffen for help in the revision.2) These concepts are due to V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fox et al. (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: