This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Security education, training, and awareness (SETA) is one of the most common and prominent strategies for organizational security governance. However, only a small portion of practitioners claimed that their SETA programs were “very effective”. A possible reason for this is the lack of a systematic understanding of the nature of SETA programs, the paths through which SETA impacts employees’ security-related beliefs or behavioral intentions, and the conditions that might influence such a relationship. This study argues that a comprehensive literature review regarding SETA is vital for holistically investigating the findings of previous SETA research and unveiling the characteristics and factors that influence the effectiveness of SETA. A total of 80 articles, published between 1998 and 2020, were included to conduct an in-depth systematic review on SETA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: