Key result
Omitting crystalloid co-loading during cesarean delivery drops cardiac output ~60% more than co-loading.
Why the study?
Hypotension is common during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and it was unknown whether omission of fluid loading is non-inferior to fluid co-loading when prophylactic phenylephrine infusion is used.
Does omission of crystalloid co-loading compared to 1 L crystalloid co-loading improve cardiac output maintenance in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia and prophylactic phenylephrine?
RCT (n=63)
Double-blind
Randomized
Does omission of crystalloid co-loading compared to 1 L crystalloid co-loading improve cardiac output maintenance in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia and prophylactic phenylephrine?
Effect estimate: Ratio 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.7)
Omission of crystalloid co-loading during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with phenylephrine infusion leads to a decrease in cardiac output and potentially unfavorable neonatal acid-base status, suggesting co-loading remains useful.
Retain crystalloid co-loading to limit cardiac output reduction during cesarean spinal anesthesia; challenges hypotheses favoring omission with phenylephrine.
BACKGROUND: Hypotension is common during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Preventive strategies include fluid loading and phenylephrine. We hypothesized that if prophylactic phenylephrine infusion is used, omission of fluid loading would be non-inferior to fluid co-loading in maintaining cardiac output. We assumed that if there was a difference, the increase in cardiac output would be greater in the no-loading than in the co-loading group. METHODS: Term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomized to receive 1 L crystalloid co-loading or maintenance fluids only. Phenylephrine was titrated to maintain blood pressure. Changes in cardiac output following spinal anesthesia were the primary outcome. The study was powered as a non-inferiority trial, allowing the no-loading arm to have a 50% greater change in cardiac output. Heart rate, dose of phenylephrine, occurrence of nausea and vomiting, Apgar scores and neonatal acid base status were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Data from 63 women were analyzed. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was 33% less increase in cardiac output with no loading (ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.36), and 60% greater reduction of cardiac output with no loading (ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.7). Total dose of phenylephrine was higher in the no-loading group. There may be a less favorable neonatal acid base status without volume loading. CONCLUSION: Omission of crystalloid co-loading leads to a decrease in cardiac output which has a potentially unfavorable impact on neonatal acid base status. We conclude that crystalloid co-loading may be useful in the presence of phenylephrine infusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buddeberg et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery (n=63). Maintenance fluids only (omission of fluid loading) vs. 1 L crystalloid co-loading was evaluated on Changes in cardiac output following spinal anesthesia (Ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7). Omission of crystalloid co-loading during cesarean delivery led to a 60% greater reduction in cardiac output compared to co-loading (ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: