Why the study?
Does transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management improve outcomes compared to conventional anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion?
Does transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management improve outcomes compared to conventional anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion?
Transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion is a viable alternative to conventional anticoagulation, allowing for early cardioversion and risk stratification.
Does not yet change anticoagulation practice for AF cardioversion; leaves open optimal TEE modifications for prospective trials.
Transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has evolved over the past decade as a viable alternative to conventional anticoagulation management. Its use grew out of a need for a more predictable, dependable, and convenient approach to this difficult management dilemma, which has become increasingly prevalent in practice as an increasing number of patients present to clinics and hospitals with atrial fibrillation. In addition to its use in risk stratification of patients scheduled to undergo cardioversion, this management strategy allows for early cardioversion, which enables a minimal delay in proceeding from the diagnosis to the institution of therapy (electrical cardioversion). This review explores the evolution of the transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy, the advantages and disadvantages of its use, and possible modifications to the strategy that would allow for a more convenient, practical, and more widely acceptable approach in the near future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Grimm (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: