Transplant-related problems have been partially overcome by using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), graft engineering, and alternative donors. In all, 21 leukemia patients with no suitable donor received a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a mismatched/haploidentical related (n=16) or unrelated donor (n=5). Fludarabine-RIC and PBSC graft were used. Manipulation was done by CD34+ selection (n=9) or CD3/CD19 depletion (n=12). Results were compared with patients (n=26) conditioned with the same regimen and grafted with a CD34+-selected PBSC from identical related donors. Median time to neutrophil recovery was 12 days (range, 10-19 d). Platelet engraftment was faster with a CD3/CD19-depleted graft (median, 11 d; range, 9-21) than with a CD34+ graft (median, 14 d; range, 9-53; P=0.003). Full donor chimerism in bone marrow CD34+ cells was higher in CD3/CD19-depleted graft group compared with CD34+-selected group (P=0.02). CD3/CD19 depletion showed higher natural killer cell counts even after 1 year. Nonrelapse mortality (7% for matched CD34+-selected grafts and 11% for mismatched/haplo-CD3/CD19-depleted grafts), relapse probability (27% for related CD34+-selected patients and 33% for related CD3/CD19-depleted patients), and disease-free survival were similar for both the groups. In conclusion, using graft engineering procedures after RIC for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offers a high probability of engraftment, fast immune recovery, and very low mortality even with mismatched donors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González‐Vicent et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: