Vapor–liquid interfacial tension of square-well (SW) fluids is calculated using three different methods viz., molecular dynamics (MD) with collision-based virial evaluation, Monte Carlo with virial computed by volume perturbation, and Binder’s density-distribution method in conjunction with grand-canonical transition-matrix Monte Carlo (GC-TMMC). Three values of the SW attractive well range parameter were studied: λ=1.5, 1.75, and 2.0, respectively. The results from MD and GC-TMMC methods are in very good mutual agreement, while the volume-perturbation method yields data of unacceptable quality. The results are compared with predictions from the statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT), and SAFT is shown to give a good estimate for the systems studied. Liquid and vapor coexistence densities and saturation pressure are determined from analysis of GC-TMMC data and the results are found to agree very well with the established literature data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: