Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strength testing has been used to determine a worker's physical capacity as well as to screen an individual for placement in future employment. A comparison is made of the relationships between two types of strenght tests (isometric and isoinertial) and the manual materials-handling (MMH) capacities of individuals. Four MMH activities were evaluated: lifting from floor to knuckle height, lifting from knuckle to shoulder height, lowering from knuckle to floor height, and carrying for a 4.3-m distance. Psychophysical capacities were determined under three frequency conditions: one-time maximum, 1 lift/min, and 6 lifts/min. I soinertial 1.83-m maximum strength (Tl), tested on the incremental weight-lifting machine, proved to be the most highly correlated strength test to the capacities for MMH activities. Second-order polynomial regression models for MMH capacities were developed using T1as a predictor. The isoinertial strength test T1 is recommended as the most promising single screening test because of its simplicity and task similarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jlang et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: