Reproductive performance of osprey (Pandion haliaetus) has been used as an indicator of health of populations and aquatic ecosystems. Reproductive output is usually assessed by a mid-May aerial survey of nest occupancy, followed by a mid-July aerial count of chicks, but measurement error margins have not been investigated. In 1992-93, we compared independent counts of chicks made from fixed- and rotor-wing aircraft by 2 observers in 2 study areas on Lake Huron, each supporting 30-40 occupied nests. Fixed-wing surveys underestimated total chick numbers (P = 0.03), but rotor-wing survey counts by both observers did not differ from actual nest contents (P = 0.7). Variation between observers in chick totals was greater on fixed-wing surveys than on rotor-wing surveys. From rotor-wing aircraft, we could differentiate some dead chicks from live chicks. Nestling mortality after mid-July was unexpectedly high in 1 study area and 18% overall. Osprey productivity data should not be interpreted without considering measurement error and post-survey nestling mortality
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewins et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: