The propositions advanced and defended in this article are: (1) that it is more urgent for educators to reach agreement on their general purposes and goals than to specify in detail the outcomes they seek; (2) that insistance on detailed statements of educational objectives is questionable; (3) that teachers should be more concerned with developing a pupil's cognitive resources than with changing his behavior; (4) that criterion‐referenced measures should supplement, not supplant norm‐referenced measures; and (5) that conventional test statistics are appropriate for criterion‐referenced tests if they are based on appropriate test responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert L. Ebel (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: