Key result
Radiographer-read single-lead ECG detects AF with only ~60% sensitivity, trailing nurse-read 12-lead ECG.
Why the study?
The study examined the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses for diagnosing AF.
Does single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers or 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses accurately diagnose atrial fibrillation in elderly men compared to cardiologist assessment?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,338)
Single-blind
No
Does single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers or 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses accurately diagnose atrial fibrillation in elderly men compared to cardiologist assessment?
12-lead ECG assessed by experienced cardiac nurses provides highly accurate detection of atrial fibrillation, while single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers offers moderate sensitivity and high specificity suitable for opportunistic screening.
Nurse-read 12-lead ECG may support accurate AF detection in elderly men; leaves open validation of radiographer single-lead ECG for screening.
Aim: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG as assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG as assessed by cardiac nurses for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Based on the Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial, we conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of 1338 randomly selected Danish men aged 65-74 years with no exclusion criteria. The participants were screened with single-lead ECG during a CT scan assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated compared with that produced by a 12-lead ECG assessed by two consenting cardiologists. Results: The study identified 68 participants with ongoing AF, of whom 60 had self-reported AF and 8 had AF detected in the screening. Single-lead ECG assessed for AF by radiographers had a sensitivity of 60.3% (95% CI 47.7 to 72.0), specificity of 97.2% (95% CI 96.2 to 98.1), positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.9% (95% CI 42.1 to 65.5) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 96.9 to 98.6). 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI 89.8 to 99.6), specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.7 to 100), PPV of 100% (95% CI 94.6 to 100) and NPV of 99.8% (95% CI 99.4 to 100). Conclusions: Single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers had a moderate sensitivity and PPV but a very high specificity and NPV. Using radiographers may be acceptable for opportunistic screening, in particular if radiographers are thoroughly trained. Thus, 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses is a potential diagnostic method for the detection of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kvist et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,338). Single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses vs. 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiologists was evaluated on Sensitivity of single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers for atrial fibrillation (95% CI 47.7 to 72.0). Single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers demonstrated a moderate sensitivity of 60.3% for detecting atrial fibrillation, while 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses achieved a high sensitivity of 97.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: