Key result
Catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter linked to ~57% higher military retention vs no ablation.
Why the study?
Despite guideline recommendations for catheter ablation in typical AFL, literature reporting the utilization and outcomes of ablation in tactical athletes is scarce.
Does catheter ablation improve military retention rates in tactical athletes with typical atrial flutter?
Cohort (n=40)
Does catheter ablation improve military retention rates in tactical athletes with typical atrial flutter?
Catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter in military tactical athletes is safe and significantly increases military retention rates compared to non-ablative management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ablation to boost retention in military atrial flutter; leaves open randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Despite guideline recommendations supporting catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFL), there is a paucity of literature reporting the utilization and outcomes of ablation in tactical athletes. This study aims to characterize military personnel diagnosed with typical AFL and investigate the rates of catheter ablation and personnel returning to normal activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Military personnel diagnosed with typical AFL from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed and the management was reviewed. Typical AFL diagnoses were confirmed by electrocardiogram and electrophysiology study with entrainment or activation mapping. RESULTS: Forty personnel (mean age, 40.7±10.7 years; 98% male; mean BMI 28.3±4.2 kg/m2; mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 58.3%±7.7) were diagnosed with typical AFL. 34/40 (85%) of service members diagnosed with typical AFL were retained on military status after diagnosis. Electrophysiology study and successful ablation was performed in 27/40 (67.5%) of personnel with no complications. 26/27 (96.3%) service members who underwent ablation were retained, whereas only 8/13 (61.2%) service members who did not receive ablation were retained (P = .001, Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: Military tactical athletes with typical AFL receive safe and effective ablations. Ablation is associated with increases in military retention rates and return to normal activity when compared to treatment without ablation. These data support the use of ablation as first-line treatment for athletic populations with typical AFL. Future studies with a larger sample size should be performed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunzi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Typical atrial flutter (n=40). Catheter ablation vs. Treatment without ablation was evaluated on Retention on military status (p=.001). Catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter in military personnel was associated with a significantly higher rate of retention on military status compared to no ablation (96.3% vs 61.2%; P=.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: