INTRODUCTION: CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ T lymphocytes expressing forkhead box protein P3 (FoxP3) and showing regulatory activity have been recently described in healthy donors. The objective of the study was to evaluate the proportion of CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ T lymphocytes within CD4+ T cells and compare their phenotypic and functional profile with that of CD4+CD25 high GITR- T lymphocytes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: The percentage of CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ cells circulating in the peripheral blood (PB) of 32 patients with SLE and 25 healthy controls was evaluated with flow cytometry. CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ cells were isolated with magnetic separation, and their phenotype was compared with that of CD4+CD25 high GITR- cells. Regulatory activity of both cell subsets was tested in autologous and heterologous co-cultures after purification through a negative sorting strategy. RESULTS: Results indicated that CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ cells are expanded in the PB of 50% of SLE patients. Expansion was observed only in patients with inactive disease. Phenotypic analysis demonstrated that CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ cells display regulatory T-cell (Treg) markers, including FoxP3, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and interleukin (IL)-10. In contrast, CD4+CD25 high GITR- cells appear to be activated and express low levels of Treg markers. Functional experiments demonstrated that CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ cells exert a higher inhibitory activity against both autologous and heterologous cells as compared with CD4+CD25 high GITR- cells. Suppression is independent of cell contact and is mediated by IL-10 and TGF-β. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic and functional data demonstrate that in SLE patients, CD4+CD25 low/-GITR+ cells are fully active Treg cells, possibly representing peripheral Treg (pTreg) that are expanded in patients with inactive disease. These data may suggest a key role of this T-cell subset in the modulation of the abnormal immune response in SLE. Strategies aimed at expanding this Treg subset for therapeutic purpose deserve to be investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nocentini et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: