Why the study?
Does dabigatran etexilate prevent thromboembolic events compared to traditional anticoagulants in patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation?
Does dabigatran etexilate prevent thromboembolic events compared to traditional anticoagulants in patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.11% vs 1.71%
p-value: p=<0.001 for superiority
Dabigatran etexilate is highlighted as a promising oral alternative to traditional anticoagulants for VTE and stroke prevention.
May support dabigatran as an alternative anticoagulant in non-valvular AF; leaves open need for prospective validation beyond this review.
Thrombo-embolic disease is a major challenging clinical problem associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Anticoagulation with the existing heparin products and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulants are still the mainstay of management. However, due to the risk of bleeding and well-documented drawbacks, the quest for a novel oral anticoagulant has led to the clinical development of dabigatran etexilate. Dabigatran etexilate is a direct thrombin (IIa) inhibitor which has recently been approved in India for prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients who have undergone major orthopaedic (total knee or hip replacement) surgery and for prevention of stroke, systemic embolism and reduction of vascular mortality in adult patients with atrial fibrillation. Thus dabigatran etexilate is a promising alternative to the current heparin products and VKAs in patients who require long-term oral anticoagulation .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jadhav et al. (2013) conducted a review in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=18,113). Dabigatran etexilate vs. Adjusted-dose warfarin (target INR 2 to 3) was evaluated on All stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or systemic embolism (p=<0.001 for superiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: