Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The microsocopic studies of N 2 on W have been made and compared with the results of the macroscopic studies. The sites of the non-dissociative chemisorption ε exist on and around the (111) plane and around the (011) plane, and the ε -adatoms increase the work function of these planes as much as 0.5 eV. While, the sites of the dissociative chemisorption ζare on and around the (001) and (111) planes, and the work function is lowered as much as 0.2 eV by the ζ-adsorption. The situation of the α-site is not determined because of its small amount. The previous studies of the work function change are interpreted reasonably by the α ε ζ-model without the suspision of impurities. These interpretations entirely differ from those of Ehrlich et al. by the αβ-model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeo Oguri (1964) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: