Most scholars agree that thinking about communication and development as a distinct discipline emerged after World War II, and they usually point out two paradigms: `modernization' versus `dependency'. In this article a new perspective is perceived in terms of a new paradigm, defined as `multiplicity in one world'. It is argued that these three paradigms imply quite divergent communication policy consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Servaes (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: