Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper describes a high-level multi-HDL design process applied to an industrial design of a single chip Videophone Codec. It makes use of many state-of-the-art design tools and methods: Behavioural VHDL control path synthesis for the controller of the Codec motion estimator; behavioural DSP synthesis from Silage to generate an application-specific calculation unit that performs vector prediction for the motion estimator; retargetable C compilation for an embedded application-specific microcontroller and multi-level (behavioural, RTL, gate) and multi-language (VHDL, Silage, C) co-simulation. We show that, with respect to a manual design process, the use of these tools led to the following results: a five-fold reduction in the source HDL description complexity; equal or better timing performance; silicon area within 15% (4% area overhead for the DSP operator, and 14% overhead for the controller) and automatically compiled assembly code (from ANSI C descriptions) that is as compact as hand-coded assembler. We also identified a strong need to pay attention to design verification issues, especially when dealing with multi-level descriptions and multiple languages. Validation of the design was the single most time consuming part of the process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulin et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: