Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
UNLABELLED: Tests for differential gene expression with RNA-seq data have a tendency to identify certain types of transcripts as significant, e.g. longer and highly-expressed transcripts. This tendency has been shown to bias gene set enrichment (GSE) testing, which is used to find over- or under-represented biological functions in the data. Yet, there remains a surprising lack of tools for GSE testing specific for RNA-seq. We present a new GSE method for RNA-seq data, RNA-Enrich, that accounts for the above tendency empirically by adjusting for average read count per gene. RNA-Enrich is a quick, flexible method and web-based tool, with 16 available gene annotation databases. It does not require a P-value cut-off to define differential expression, and works well even with small sample-sized experiments. We show that adjusting for read counts per gene improves both the type I error rate and detection power of the test. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: RNA-Enrich is available at http://lrpath.ncibi.org or from supplemental material as R code. CONTACT: sartorma@umich.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: