Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critics of game theory claim that it can be used to rationalize anything—even bank presidents setting their pants on fire in public. This article verifies the claim with a simple signalling model. The paper goes on to argue, however, that this criticsm is without force. Game theory is a toolbox for constructing useful models, rather than an empirically substantive theory; its power comes from imposing logical discipline upon the stories we tell.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven Postrel (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: