Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brookmeyer and Crowley derived a non-parametric confidence interval for the median survival time of a homogeneous population by inverting a generalization of the sign test for censored data. The 1 - alpha confidence interval for the median is essentially the set of all values t such that the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival curve at time t does not differ significantly from one-half at the two-sided alpha level. Su and Wei extended this approach to the two-sample problem and derived a confidence interval for the difference in median survival times based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the individual survival curves and a 'minimum dispersion' test statistic. Here, I incorporate covariates into the analysis by assuming a proportional hazards model for the covariate effects, while leaving the two underlying survival curves virtually unconstrained. I generate a simultaneous confidence region for the two median survival times, adjusted to any selected value, z, of the covariate vector using a test-based approach analogous to Brookmeyer and Crowley's for the one-sample case. This region is, in turn, used to derive a confidence interval for the difference in median survival times between the two treatment groups at the selected value of z. Employment of a procedure suggested by Aitchison sets the level of the simultaneous region to a value that should yield, at least approximately, the desired confidence coefficient for the difference in medians. Simulation studies indicate that the method provides reasonably accurate coverage probabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theodore Karrison (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: