Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article aims to begin to fill a gap in the literature by offering a comprehensive critique of Douglass North’s work with emphasis on his historical studies. After a brief overview of his theoretical contributions, a closer scrutiny of his theory in its application to history is offered. North’s histories are found to be problematic. To resolve the difficulties involved requires a break with his methodology and the supplemented neoclassical economics from which it is drawn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milonakis et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: