ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommentNEXTProduct Branching Ratios in the NH2 + NO Reaction: A Re-EvaluationJ. Park and M. C. LinView Author Information Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 44, 8906–8907Publication Date (Web):October 15, 1999Publication History Received18 March 1999Revised7 September 1999Published online15 October 1999Published inissue 1 November 1999https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp990954fhttps://doi.org/10.1021/jp990954farticle-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 1999 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views308Altmetric-Citations24LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (29 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Chemical reactions,Kinetic modeling,Kinetic parameters,Reaction rate theory,Transfer reactions Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: