Key result
Tinzaparin enters randomized testing versus no prophylaxis for VTE prevention in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Why the study?
Colorectal cancer activates the clotting system and carries a higher bleeding risk, requiring careful risk-benefit evaluation of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.
Does tinzaparin prevent venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line systemic therapy?
RCT (n=526)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does tinzaparin prevent venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line systemic therapy?
The PROTINCOL trial protocol outlines a study to evaluate whether weight-adjusted tinzaparin reduces the incidence of venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Lacks randomized evidence for tinzaparin VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory metastatic colorectal cancer; PROTINCOL RCT will deliver the first data.
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. CRC leads to increased activation of the clotting system. Since CRC patients present a higher rate of bleeding, careful evaluation of the risk/benefits of anticoagulant prophylaxis is necessary. AIMS: To evaluate low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for primary thromboprophylaxis in metastatic CRC outpatients receiving first-line systemic cancer therapy. METHODS: PROTINCOL (NCT05625932) is a randomized, open-label (PROBE), multicenter study. Patients will receive tinzaparin (75 IU/kg) or no pharmacological prophylaxis for 4 months and will be stratified based on: BRAF/RAS mutation, primary resection tumor and antiangiogenic therapy. The study outcomes will be assessed by a blinded central independent adjudication committee. The primary efficacy endpoints will include the cumulative incidence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE) event (symptomatic or incidental) including symptomatic central venous catheter VTE. Secondary variables will be clinically relevant bleedings, health-related quality of life and the predictive value of validated risk assessment scales of VTE, including the genetic risk score (TIC-ONCO). Our hypothesis is that prophylactic LMWH will reduce the 55% relative risk to an estimated VTE incidence of 13.5%. A total of 526 patients will be required. DISCUSSION: Risk prediction of chemotherapy-associated VTE is a compelling challenge in oncology, as VTE may result in treatment delays, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Patients with a single type of metastatic cancer with a high risk of VTE will be selected for study inclusion. For the first time in ambulatory prophylaxis of cancer-associated thrombosis, a precision medicine approach will be used in a clinical trial. If the individualization of antithrombotic prophylaxis can reduce the complications of outpatient cancer treatment and be cost effective, it would be of great value in the future care of patients with metastatic CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05625932. Registered on 15 Nov 2022. TRIAL STATUS: The trial started recruitment on March 2023.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Metastatic colorectal cancer (n=526). Tinzaparin vs. No pharmacological prophylaxis was evaluated on Cumulative incidence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE) event (symptomatic or incidental) at 4 months. Tinzaparin will be evaluated for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism compared to no prophylaxis in 526 ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the randomized PROTINCOL trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: