Intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) is a promising technology to reconfigure wireless channels, which brings a new degree of freedom for the design of future wireless networks. This article proposes a new three-dimensional (3D) wireless system architecture enabled by aerial IRS (AIRS). Compared to the conventional terrestrial IRS, AIRS enjoys more deployment flexibility as well as wider-view signal reflection, thanks to its high altitude and thus more likelihood of establishing line-of-sight (LoS) links with ground source/destination nodes. We aim to maximize the worst-case signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) over all locations in a target area by jointly optimizing the transmit beamforming for the source node, as well as the placement and 3D passive beamforming for the AIRS. The formulated problem is non-convex and difficult to solve. To gain useful insights, we first consider the special case of maximizing the SNR at a given target location, for which the optimal solution is obtained in closed-form. The result shows that the optimal horizontal AIRS placement only depends on the ratio between the source-destination distance and the AIRS altitude. Then for the general case of AIRS-enabled area coverage, we propose an efficient solution by decoupling the AIRS passive beamforming design to maximize the worst-case array gain, from its placement optimization by balancing the resulting angular span and the cascaded channel path loss. Our proposed solution is based on a novel 3D beam broadening and flattening technique, where the passive array of the AIRS is divided into sub-arrays of appropriate size, and their phase shifts are designed to form a flattened beam pattern with adjustable beamwidth catering to the size of the coverage area. Both uniform linear array (ULA)-based and uniform planar array (UPA)-based AIRSs are considered in our design, which enable two-dimensional (2D) and 3D passive beamforming, respectively. Numerical results show that the proposed designs achieve significant performance gains over the benchmark schemes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: