Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
본 연구는 간호대학생을 대상으로 셀프리더십, 비판적 사고성향, 임상실습만족도 및 임상수행능력의 관계를 확인하고 임상실습만족도와 임상수행능력에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보고자 시행되었다. 두 개의 광역시에 소재하는 2개의 4년제 간호학과 3, 4학년에 재학 중인 199명을 대상으로 설문지로 측정하였다. 연구결과 간호대학생이 인지하는 셀프리더십, 비판적 사고 성향, 임상실습만족도 및 임상수행능력은 중간 이상으로 나타났으며, 이들 간에는 모두 유의한 순 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 임상실습만족도에 영향을 주는 예측요인은 실습학기 (<TEX>β=.223</TEX>, t=3.534, p=.001), 전공만족 (<TEX>β=.257</TEX>, t=3.962, p <.001), 비판적 사고성향 (<TEX>β=.217</TEX>, t=3.118, p=.002), 셀프리더십(<TEX>β=.169</TEX>, t=2.260, p=.025)이었으며 30.4%의 설명력을 나타냈다 (F=19.145, p <.001). 임상수행능력에 영향을 주는 예측요인은 건강상태 (<TEX>β=-.133</TEX>, t=-1.937, p=.054), 비판적 사고성향 (<TEX>β=.316</TEX>, t=2.551, p=.012), 셀프리더십 (<TEX>β=.323</TEX>, t=4.181, p <.001)이었으며 23.7%의 설명력을 나타냈다(F=10.948, p <.001). 따라서 간호대학생의 임상실습만족도와 임상수행능력을 높이기 위해서는 간호대학생의 비판적 사고와 셀프리더십을 높일 수 있는 교육과정 프로그램의 개발 및 적용이 필요하다. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among self-leadership, critical thinking disposition, satisfaction of clinical practice and clinical practice competency of nursing students. Participants were 199 baccalaureate nursing students (3rd and 4th grades) in 2 cities. The data was collected by questionnaires and were analyzed with the SPSS/Win 21.0 program, using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression. Significant positive correlations were among self-leadership, critical thinking disposition, satisfaction of clinical practice and clinical practice competency. The regression model explained 30.4% of satisfaction of clinical practice. The significant predictors of satisfaction of clinical practice were clinical experience, satisfaction of major, self-leadership and critical thinking disposition. The regression model explained 23.7% of clinical practice competency. Health status, self-leadership and critical thinking disposition were factors influencing clinical practice competency. It should strengthen self-leadership and encourage critical thinking disposition to improve nursing students' satisfaction of clinical practice and clinical practice competency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: