This article investigates how mountain naming practices have changed in the New Zealand Alpine Journal (NZAJ) from the late 19th century to the present day. More specifically, the study considers how the two mountains Aoraki / Mount Cook (New Zealand) and Denali / Mount McKinley (USA) have been referred to in the journal and how toponymic etymologies are discussed in contributions to the publication. Overall, the findings show that there is a clear tendency to using a mountain's indigenous name more frequently the closer the journal moves towards the present. There are, however, some differences, with an 'indigenous-first' option being preferred for Aoraki / Mount Cook and the indigenous name Denali being preferred on its own for Denali / Mount McKinley. The etymologies of mountain names are discussed for both indigenous and colonial names in the NZAJ, but there is relatively little evidence of metalinguistic discussion about reverting back to indigenous names.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sven Leuckert (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: