Key result
Higher team-based continuity of care (4th vs 1st quartile) was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.89).
Why the study?
Maintaining one-to-one continuity of care is challenging in public healthcare settings, so the relationship between team-based continuity of care and CVD risk in diabetes needed evaluation.
Does higher team-based continuity of care reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=312,068)
Yes
Does higher team-based continuity of care reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89)
Higher team-based continuity of care is associated with a significantly lower risk of incident cardiovascular diseases among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Hypothesis-generating for team-based continuity in type 2 diabetes; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a long-term sequela of diabetes. Better individual-based continuity of care has been reported to reduce the risk of chronic complications among patients with diabetes. Maintaining a one-to-one patient-physician relationship is often challenging, especially in public health care settings. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between higher team-based continuity of care, defined as consultations provided by the same physician team, and CVD risks in patients with diabetes from public primary care clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in Hong Kong of 312,068 patients with type 2 diabetes and without any history of CVD at baseline (defined as the earliest attendance at a doctor's consultation in a public-sector clinic between 2008 and 2018). Team-based continuity of care was measured using the usual provider continuity index (UPCI), calculated by the proportion of consultations provided by the most visited physician team in the 2 years before baseline. Patients were divided into quartiles based on their UPCI, and the characteristics of the quartiles were balanced using propensity score fine stratification weights. Multivariable Cox regression was applied to assess the effect of team-based continuity of care on CVD incidence. Patient demographics, smoking status, physiological measurements, number of attendances, comorbidities, and medications were adjusted for in the propensity weightings and regression analyses. RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 6.5 years, the total number of new CVD events was 52,428. Compared with patients in the 1st quartile, patients in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles of the UCPI had a CVD hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.92-0.97), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), and 0.87 (0.84-0.89), respectively, indicating that higher continuity of care was associated with lower CVD risks. The subtypes of CVD, including coronary heart disease and stroke, also showed a similar pattern. Subgroup analyses suggested that patients <65 years of age had greater benefits from higher team-based continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based continuity of care was associated with lower CVD risk among individuals with type 2 diabetes, especially those who were younger. This suggests a potential flexible alternative implementation of continuity of care in public clinics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=312,068). Higher team-based continuity of care (UPCI 4th quartile) vs. Lowest team-based continuity of care (UPCI 1st quartile) was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease incidence (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.89). Higher team-based continuity of care (4th vs 1st quartile) was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: