// Denis L. Fontes Jardim 1 , Debora de Melo Gagliato 1 , Gerald S. Falchook 1 , Filip Janku 1 , Ralph Zinner 1 , Jennifer J. Wheler 1 , Vivek Subbiah 1 , Sarina A. Piha-Paul 1 , Siqing Fu 1 , Mariela Blum Murphy 2 , Jaffer Ajani 2 , Chad Tang 3 , Kenneth Hess 4 , Stanley R. Hamilton 4 , Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri 4 , Razelle Kurzrock 5 , Funda Meric-Bernstam 1 , David S. Hong 1 1 Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA 2 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA 3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA 4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA 5 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA Correspondence: David S. Hong, email: // Keywords : MET mutation, MET amplification, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, c-MET inhibitor Received : January 28, 2014 Accepted : March 14 , 2014 Published : March 16, 2014 Abstract We sought to investigate the demographics and tumor-associated features in patients with gastroesophageal (GE) malignancies referred to our Phase I Program who had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from archival or new biopsies tested for MET mutation and/or amplification. MET amplification was found in 5 of 76 (6.6%) patients (3/34 [ 8 . 8 %] esophageal, 2/26 [ 7 . 7 %] gastric and none in 22 gastroesophageal junction cancers). The only MET mutation detected in 3 of 41 (7.3%) patients was N375S. No demographic and histologic characteristics were associated with specific MET abnormalities. Median overall survival was 3 and 5 months for patients with and without a MET alteration, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 5.5; P=.14). Sixteen of 81 (20%) patients were enrolled in a c- MET inhibitor trial. Best responses were stable disease in 3 patients (19%), including a patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma that remained on the trial for 9.9 months (wild-type for MET abnormality). All tumors with MET abnormality (n=3) progressed on a c- MET inhibitor in fewer than 2 months. In conclusion, MET abnormalities can be found in a small group of patients with GE adenocarcinoma and further studies are necessary to better characterize the prognostic and predictive impact of MET alterations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jardim et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: