Key result
A prediction model based on fNIRS functional connectivity successfully predicted the degree of distracted driving (break reaction time) in 11 of 12 participants during actual driving.
Why the study?
Distracted driving causes traffic accidents, and predicting a driver's attentional state could prevent distractions and promote safe driving.
Can fNIRS functional connectivity predict the degree of distracted driving based on break reaction time?
Observational (n=12)
Can fNIRS functional connectivity predict the degree of distracted driving based on break reaction time?
fNIRS functional connectivity can be used to predict the degree of distracted driving during actual driving tasks.
fNIRS connectivity models may predict distracted driving; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before any application.
Distracted driving is one of the main causes of traffic accidents. By predicting the attentional state of drivers, it is possible to prevent distractions and promote safe driving. In this study, we developed a model that could predict the degree of distracted driving based on brain activity. Changes in oxyhemoglobin concentrations were measured in drivers while driving a real car using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). A regression model was constructed for each participant using functional connectivity as an explanatory variable and break reaction time to random beeps while driving as an objective variable. As a result, we were able to construct a prediction model for 11 of the 12 participants. Furthermore, the regression model with the highest prediction accuracy for each participant was analyzed to gain a better understanding of the neural basis of distracted driving. The 11 models were classified into five clusters by hierarchical clustering based on their functional connectivity edges used in each cluster. The results showed that the combinations of the dorsal attention network (DAN)-sensory motor network (SMN) and DAN-ventral attention network (VAN) connections were common in all clusters and that these networks were essential to predict the degree of distraction in complex multitask driving. They also confirmed the existence of multiple types of prediction models with different within- and between-network connectivity patterns. These results indicate that it is possible to predict the degree of distracted driving based on the brain activity of the driver during actual driving. These results are expected to contribute to the development of safe driving systems and elucidation of the neural basis of distracted driving.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogihara et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Distracted driving (n=12). fNIRS functional connectivity prediction model was evaluated on Break reaction time to random beeps while driving. A prediction model based on fNIRS functional connectivity successfully predicted the degree of distracted driving (break reaction time) in 11 of 12 participants during actual driving.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: