Objective: Develop an accessible education module and test whether presence of diabetes complicationsandfunctionalimpairmentsdifferentiallyimpactedinterventionusability. Method: 30AfricanAmericanswith type 2 diabetes completed 1 of 4 (90-min) group education classes. Preintervention measuresincluded medical history, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form8, Telephone Interview for CognitiveStatus, and Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Test. For outcomes comparisons, patientswere categorized according to functional impairment (physical; physical cognitive or physical visual; physical cognitive visual) and number of diabetes complications (01, 23, 46). Outcomemeasures were knowledge test change scores and patient ratings of satisfaction and accessibility of classand materials. Results: Education resulted in increased mean knowledge scores, from 6.6 to 11.3 ( p .001), with signicant learning found for participants in all functional impairment categories and with03 complications. Patient ratings of accessibility and satisfaction were high (4243 of 45), with minorareas identied for improvement among persons with excess complications (46) and impairment(physical cognitive visual). Conclusion: The diabetes education module demonstrated accessibilityand effectiveness. It may be particularly useful in treating high-risk, diabetic adults with existingcomplications, functional impairment, or disability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hill‐Briggs et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: